RE: "svn move" broken?

So the order should be:

svn up
svn ci

and not:

svn ci
svn up

?

I always do the latter. (I am the only developer at the moment. Will soon
get a 2nd developer.)

--Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Sander Striker [mailto:striker@apache.org]
Sent: donderdag 5 juni 2003 10:25
To: Michael Schmitt; dev@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: RE: "svn move" broken?

> From: Michael Schmitt [mailto:schmitt@TI.Uni-Trier.DE]
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 9:11 AM

[...]
> Although all previous commits were successful (at least I thought so),
> svn did not update my working copy correctly! Or, more precisely, it did
> not update the meta information in my working copy, since the real files
> had definitely gone before! And there was no other user working in this
> project at the same time.
>
> Do you have any idea how this could happen?

Yes, this is expected behaviour. Even if you are the only developer on
a project you should still do:

  svn update
  svn commit

Sander

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jun 5 10:28:12 2003