Re: RFC: Make apply_textdelta unconditional

I'll take this as "not an objection" and re-prepare my patch for
checkin.

On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 04:23, Greg Stein wrote:
> > Because of the incompatible ra_svn pipelining change, I'd like this to
> > make it into 0.24, so that we don't break ra_svn compatibility for
> > another two releases in a row. But apart from that, I can wait.
>
> Dang. Where's that email about people not wanting the protocol to alter the
> APIs in Subversion... hmm... :-)

Well, what you quoted is merely an argument for changing the
scheduling. I think the API change is a good idea because the skelta
decision shouldn't be happening on a per-file basis (or on both sides of
the editor interface); the ra_svn inefficiency is merely fallout from
that wart.

> I also seem to recall a change to get
> revnum info early (in a separate roundtrip(!)) because it couldn't happen
> during a particular RA implementation's editor drive... :-)

Would that be ra_local? Because we had set_target_revision well before
I wrote any lines of ra_svn.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 2 21:48:07 2003