[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: New diff syntax? (see issue #1142)

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2003-05-17 17:44:16 CEST

cmpilato@collab.net writes:

> > Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:
> > > I proposed dropping the "iterative" diff last year, and I seem to
> > > remember that I got little support for it.
> Sorry if this turn of events leaves you sour, Philip.

I'm not sour at all--it's going to work the way I think it should work
and I didn't have to code it :)

I really am interested in the procedure we use to evaluate ideas like
this. The outcome was different last time, does this mean that if we
were to ask again six months from now we would get a different answer?
I really would like to know if the reason for the change is because
people changed their minds or because a different group of people
could be bothered to speak up. Was it experience with the old
interface? Were the arguments more convincing this time?

Philip Martin
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat May 17 17:45:12 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.