Re: Logging granularity
From: maru <maru_at_mobile.rogers.com>
Date: 2003-05-16 02:10:03 CEST
My first responsibility is to apologize for my previous remarks. You are correct, my comments can only be construed as a personal attack. I've let my frustration over the intractibility of this issue get the better of me, and I hope you'll forgive me.
My original intent in questioning the subversion approach to logging was to try to find a compelling argument as to why per-commit logging should supplant per-file+per-commit logging. I was more than a little dismayed to find that per-file logging is seen as a 'bad' feature based largely on developer experience with it in cvs (thanks to Karl for the clarification). I would argue that there are other scm systems that provide this functionality (re: bk) and whose users (probably) appreciate it.
Beyond implementation challenges or bad cvs memories, the exclusion of per-file logging from svn appears to be largely one of svn developer preference. Logging granularity is clearly a religious issue - I wish I had realized this earlier. There is little I can do to pursuade die-hard fans of revision-only logging that per-file logging has any merit. There is little you can do to convince me that bad experiences with one revision system - cvs - justify the exclusion of per-file logging from svn. I hope we can just agree to disagree on this. I'm sure you have better things to do than argue with feature-whiners such as myself.
>Your flippancy in the face of constructive criticism of a seeming lack of respect for users is instructive. I won't belabour the point but it is always disappointing to see such arrogance among developers. Commit each file seperately indeed! If your viewpoint is representative of the svn delopment team, my arguments for more log granularity will clearly fall on deaf ears. I'll leave it at that.
As to "lack of respect for users" and "arrogance": Did I "categorically
Well, if you think I should quietly accede to your demands, you can damn
By the bye, your "arguments for more granularity" have been, in order of
>I see value in [this] approach
These aren't arguments, they're opinions. You'll have to try harder.
-- Brane ─îibej <brane_at_xbc.nu> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: email@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.orgReceived on Fri May 16 02:12:00 2003
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.