Re: Logging granularity
From: maru <maru_at_mobile.rogers.com>
Date: 2003-05-15 23:33:19 CEST
So out of curiosity, is svn targetted only at making a better cvs? I thought the idea was to make something truly world-beating. It's a solid, well-designed application. You harp on how much better its approach is to cvs. But why set your benchmark so low? Why not acknowledge that the real target is to match best-of-breed tools like bitkeeper or perforce? Subversion has the potential to be the _best_ scm, not just the best _free_ scm. If your only example is cvs, I'd say pretty much anything would impress you.
-----Original Message-----
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:54:26PM +0200, Branko ??ibej wrote:
Just to second Brane's point -- I never used to follow this practice with
Also, having one message per global revision makes it so, so much easier
-brian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.