Re: RFC -- new 'svn status' symbol

John Barstow <John_Barstow@gfsg.co.nz> writes:

> cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
> > Seriously, though, is there any reason not to overload the '!' to mean
> > both "missing" and "incomplete" ? Both indicate a problem that is
> > solved using 'svn up'.
>
> +1 on this. I'm already hardwired to run svn up when I see this.

This isn't a bad idea. It banks on habits we already have.

And... it means we get to avoided the dreaded question of what column
we would use when displaying a new symbol. :-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu May 15 07:16:51 2003