Re: [PATCH][RESEND] Issue #1295 (take 5)
From: Mark Grosberg <mark_at_nolab.conman.org>
Date: 2003-05-14 05:52:03 CEST
On 13 May 2003 kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
Here are some things I don't mind doing:
* Breaking up the patch into two parts - one to add the UNMARKED
The generic functionality may be useful to other clients as well.
* Adding a configuration option that the command line client reads
* Do what Brane suggested and let the truncate routine locate
> I hate to say it, but the more I think about it, the less I'd like to
Would a config option make sense in this case or would it be litter?
I guess I personally see this as a desierable feature given my work
> I certainly wouldn't veto it, if people feel strongly that it should
Can we re-open the issue with voting? Perhaps the originator of the issue
> patch review cycle, which could waste Mark's time (and annoy him,
I save my bad attitude for my job. :-)
L8r,
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.