Re: [PATCH] Issue #1295 (take 2, with log)

Mark Grosberg wrote:

>On 9 May 2003 kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>
>
>>Of course, one way to answer my user interface questions is to supply
>>the documentation patches with the code patches :-). Changes to the
>>.xml files in doc/book/book/ are welcome.
>>
>>
>
>After the patch goes in to the code I'll do the doc updates as a second
>pass. Is that okay?
>
>

I guess so, but the behaviour must be documented in the function's
docstring when the patch goes in.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org