Re: [PATCH] Issue #1295 (take 2, with log)
From: Mark Grosberg <mark_at_nolab.conman.org>
Date: 2003-05-09 19:49:08 CEST
On 9 May 2003 kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Mark, just a quick sanity check:
Yup.
> understanding from reading the code in process_comitted_list (er,
> Conversely, what are the ways someone could get a target eliminated
Yes.
> b) Change the modification letter code at the start of its line?
No. In this case, it would error out. I did that on purpose because I
I can fix the spelling things and do take 5, should I?
> (And Brane already pointed out the problems with the 'silent return'
Take 4 does not have this problem.
> Of course, one way to answer my user interface questions is to supply
After the patch goes in to the code I'll do the doc updates as a second
L8r,
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.