Re: svn commit: rev 5814 - in trunk/subversion: libsvn_wc tests/clients/cmdline

On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 04:43:38PM +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
> We have more than one implementation. I think switch shares the
> update implementation, but consider
>
> 'svn diff -rX'
>
> where there is a missing item in the working copy that has been
> deleted in revision X. Do we need to modify the diff client to handle
> this case? (Do we even know what it should do? I think the diff
> command should indicate the deletion, but it would not surprise me if
> other people thought differently.)
>

I frequently use "svn diff" as an extra-verbose version of "svn status".
It would be strange for "svn diff -r BASE" to behave differently
from "svn diff", and strange for "svn diff -r X" to behave differently
from "svn diff -r BASE".

--ben

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 6 17:57:51 2003