Re: error message using revision named FIRST

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-05-02 14:15:49 CEST

Hans Marggraff <hmf@qint.de> writes:

> In the current implementation FIRST is hard coded as rev 0 which is rather
> uninteresting.
>
> If FIRST pointed to the first revision of the branch, then merging
> would be easier because this is the revision that is frequently used
> for merging from.

Yes, and someday when svn implements 'merge tracking', it will
remember these things -- not only revs in which branches were created,
but also exactly which sets of revs get merged.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri May 2 14:17:53 2003

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ben Collins-Sussman: "Re: [PATCH] SWIG-Java binding work"
Previous message: Benjamin Pflugmann: "Re: ignore not recursive to subdirectories"
In reply to: Hans Marggraff: "error message using revision named FIRST"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]