Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
> I think the new _try() variants can crash because they assume the associated
> set exists, so that it can retrieve a pool for the new baton.
>
> It isn't crashing in our case because the client add/delete functions will
> manually open an access baton, and then call the svn_wc_* function with that
> baton as the associated set.
>
> IOW, it appears that all of our current uses of svn_wc_* pass in an
> associated set, which is why we aren't seeing any crashes right now.
Ah, I understand what you're saying better now -- will look at it.
(My comments so far have been based on memory, so it's possible that
there's some unspoken assumption in the code that just didn't get
documented; if so, I'll remember it when I see it.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 29 02:46:58 2003