Re: "transaction has active cursors" / "Invalid change ordering" ???

Brian Denny <brian@briandenny.net> writes:

> On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 04:40:32PM -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> >
> > If you schedule a file for deletion and then commit, guess what? The
> > file's entry isn't really gone yet. It's marked as "deleted" --
> > past-tense. Why? For update reporting. When reporting wc state to
>
> and the same thing should happen if you explicitly update a file or
> directory to a revision in which that item doesn't exist, right?
> (i think Issue 919 is about this.)

Oooh, good point!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Apr 27 16:30:06 2003