[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: "transaction has active cursors" / "Invalid change ordering" ???

From: Brian Denny <brian_at_briandenny.net>
Date: 2003-04-26 21:00:33 CEST

On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 04:40:32PM -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> If you schedule a file for deletion and then commit, guess what? The
> file's entry isn't really gone yet. It's marked as "deleted" --
> past-tense. Why? For update reporting. When reporting wc state to

and the same thing should happen if you explicitly update a file or
directory to a revision in which that item doesn't exist, right?
(i think Issue 919 is about this.)


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Apr 26 20:56:54 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.