[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [RFC/PATCH] Revamping ra_svn tunnel agents

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2003-04-27 07:31:31 CEST

> So from a technical perspective, I'm not really sure which is
> better: my patch, with the libsvn_ra hack to allow "+foo" suffixes
> in URL schemes, or your suggestion, which plays with the URL syntax.

mbk weighed in in favor of svn:scheme: over IRC, and I don't have a
strong opinion, so it's currently 2 to 0 for svn:scheme:. So if you
had your heart set on svn+scheme:, speak up soon or suffer the agony
of witnessing an improperly painted bikeshed.

(It seems there is a certain amount of precedent for foo:bar: schemes
in jdbc:, though it sounds like that whole URL scheme is pretty

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Apr 27 07:32:17 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.