Re: [RFC/PATCH] Revamping ra_svn tunnel agents

> So from a technical perspective, I'm not really sure which is
> better: my patch, with the libsvn_ra hack to allow "+foo" suffixes
> in URL schemes, or your suggestion, which plays with the URL syntax.

mbk weighed in in favor of svn:scheme: over IRC, and I don't have a
strong opinion, so it's currently 2 to 0 for svn:scheme:. So if you
had your heart set on svn+scheme:, speak up soon or suffer the agony
of witnessing an improperly painted bikeshed.

(It seems there is a certain amount of precedent for foo:bar: schemes
in jdbc:, though it sounds like that whole URL scheme is pretty
dubious.)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Apr 27 07:32:17 2003