[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: [PROPOSAL] Merging Improved

From: Sander Striker <striker_at_apache.org>
Date: 2003-04-11 00:01:44 CEST

> From: Branko Cibej [mailto:brane@xbc.nu]
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 11:03 PM

>> Sander Striker wrote:
>> I also found out that I forgot about one rule in the
>> bookkeeping process:
>> If the MRCA of M and L is not the same path as M, then
>> a line needs to be added to svn:merge that contains the
>> MRCA of M and the HEAD of the path of the MRCA of M and L
>> (you might need to re-read that twice).
>> Example 3. M1 is a good example of this.
> Let me see if I understand... that's where you got the trunk@34 line in
> M1 in example 3, right?


> Hm, (scratch scratch). Isn't that always the same as the branchpoint
> of M's path?

No. Consider attached example. Ofcourse you always bring forward
interesting cases ;). In this case I clearly forgot about something.

We need to find _all_ the branchpoints of M until we hit the path of the
MCRA, and either record them all or decide to infer them at the time
we need them. The latter could lead to some brute force searching
at a later point in time though (for every source merged that doesn't
have an entry in svn:merged-from yet).


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Received on Fri Apr 11 00:02:34 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.