Re: [PROPOSAL] Merging Improved

Sander Striker wrote:

>>From: Sander Striker [mailto:striker@apache.org]
>>Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 9:17 PM
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>Note that example 2 and 3 contain some flaws. Please
>>disregard those until I repost.
>>
>>
>
>Ok, fixed.
>
>I also found out that I forgot about one rule in the
>bookkeeping process:
>
>If the MRCA of M and L is not the same path as M, then
>a line needs to be added to svn:merge that contains the
>MRCA of M and the HEAD of the path of the MRCA of M and L
>(you might need to re-read that twice).
>
>Example 3. M1 is a good example of this.
>

Let me see if I understand... that's where you got the trunk@34 line in
M1 in example 3, right? Hm, (scratch scratch). Isn't that always the
same as the branchpoint of M's path?

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org