[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: The `on_disk' and `in_repos' templates.

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-04-08 22:42:17 CEST

Josef Wolf <jw@raven.inka.de> writes:

> On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 11:22:39AM -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> > Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:
> > > Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:
> [ lots of arguing deleted ]
> What the heck? You are arguing back and forth whether to catch the fly
> or not. But no one have given any response to the _already_ _existing_
> solution that is _already_ more powerful than the simple templates you
> are debating about. Are you that infected by the NIH-syndrome that you
> do not even take a look on _already_ _existing_ solutions? I admit
> that this solution is far away from beeing perfect. But it already
> solves (not only) the problems you are debating about. Just go ahead
> and take a look at it and say what you dislike in it.

Sorry, don't mean to ignore your solution.

Karl and I are merely arguing to remove the the current solution from
the C API. Once we all agree that the solution should exist in the
world of scripting, then it makes sense to start evaluating particular
scripting solutions. We're just not there yet.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 8 22:44:38 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.