[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: The `on_disk' and `in_repos' templates.

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2003-04-08 22:07:30 CEST

Josef Wolf <jw@raven.inka.de> writes:
> What the heck? You are arguing back and forth whether to catch the fly
> or not. But no one have given any response to the _already_ _existing_
> solution that is _already_ more powerful than the simple templates you
> are debating about. Are you that infected by the NIH-syndrome that you
> do not even take a look on _already_ _existing_ solutions? I admit
> that this solution is far away from beeing perfect. But it already
> solves (not only) the problems you are debating about. Just go ahead
> and take a look at it and say what you dislike in it.

Are you talking about the CGI script, Josef?

The proposal under discussion is about getting the solution out of the
C API, on the grounds that external solutions are better. So if
you're claiming that your external solution is one such, then great;
and if you're not, that's fine too. It doesn't affect this discussion
much either way.

Don't be so prickly :-).

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 8 22:50:38 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.