On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 10:09:20PM -0600, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> Brian Denny <brian@briandenny.net> writes:
>
> > I'd prefer to allow unauthenticated read-only access to my repository,
> > so if anyone knows another way around this problem, let me know.
> >
> > And, should Appendix D mention this issue?
>
> This sounds related to what Appendix D is talking about: some win32
> boxes demand authentication even when apache doesn't. And here you
> are, saying that forcing apache to issue a challenge makes webfolders
> work. Hmmmmmmm.
the weird thing was, when it wasn't working, apache *was* issuing the
challenge but windows didn't handle that correctly. forcing apache to
issue a challenge *sooner* (on read) makes it work.
> Webfolders seems totally inconsistent from machine to machine, and
> quite fubar to me. :-)
just what i wanted to hear. :-/
actually, my employer probably would want to require authentication for
read access too, so if i can at least get *this* behavior to appear
consistenly inside my office, web folders may be just the ticket for our
graphic designers and content writers.
-brian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Mar 24 07:37:53 2003