> Sorry, but that's not acceptable. Any patch that I'd consider for
> inclusion must have the following characteristics:
>
> * It must be possible to create separate DLLs for each libsvn_*
> library. If the patch also lets you build one huge DLL, that's
> fine, but multiple DLLs is a prerequisite.
Just ignore the *dsp the patch includes and change the
library project to output a dll instead of a static lib and you're done.
It's even easier to produce several dll's instead of a big one, but
since I wanted that I included such a dsp file.
> * It must introduce a DLL naming convention for:
> o Debug vs. Release builds
> o VC6 vs. VC7 builds
I'm not sure what you mean about this. If you mean different
names for each of those dll's then that can be done in the
project files easily. Since I don't have VC6 I didn't touch those
but someone with VC6 won't have any problems to do that.
What I did was the 'big' work of changing all header and
source files.
> * It must not mandate the use of non-generated lists of exported
> functions.
It doesn't.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Mar 23 21:58:08 2003