Re: [PATCH] non static libs on windows (dll)

SteveKing wrote:

>>Actually, if we're talking about making DLLs for each Subversion
>>library, there are quite a few of them, and there are many, many calls
>>across those APIs, between the libraries themselves. Still, the point
>>about modern hardware is a valid one.
>>
>>
>
>That would be one possibility. But I'd like to make one single dll where
>all the smaller libs are packed into.
>
>

Sorry, but that's not acceptable. Any patch that I'd consider for
inclusion must have the following characteristics:

    * It must be possible to create separate DLLs for each libsvn_*
      library. If the patch also lets you build one huge DLL, that's
      fine, but multiple DLLs is a prerequisite.
    * It must introduce a DLL naming convention for:
          o Debug vs. Release builds
          o VC6 vs. VC7 builds
    * It must not mandate the use of non-generated lists of exported
      functions.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org