On Saturday, March 22, 2003, at 02:32 PM, Derek J. Balling wrote:
>
> On Saturday, March 22, 2003, at 02:18 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
>>> - a better solution to the infov() issue probably needs to be
>>> figured out.
>>
>> I wonder if apr-iconv would work on AIX?
>
> Maybe, but IMHO, they've got to actually make a tarball available of
> something before you can really consider it an option... :-/
> apr-iconv is way too much of a moving target at the moment. You could
> check it out today, I could check it out tomorrow, and one might work
> and the other not, and there's no real way, short of telling people
> "get a CVS co of the apr-iconv tree as of $DATE".
>
> Unless you want to start bundling it in the subversion tarballs like
> the other apr bits are. :-/
actually, i believe apr-iconv was tagged for the 0.9.2 release along
with apr and apr-util, so it will have a stable release we can target
"real soon now".
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Mar 22 21:07:25 2003