Re: RA_SVN TEST FAILURE: log_tests.py 3: test 'svn log' on an empty repository

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> Hm, that's not exactly how I envisioned fixing the error reporting issue
> for "svn log" (I had figured each log message would go in a command
> response), but I can't see any reason why my way would be better. So
> the patch looks fine.
>
> It's a lot easier if we don't worry about ra_svn compatibility at this
> stage. (Since we're not eating the ra_svn dog food, it's less of a pain
> to deal with incompatibilities, I think. I haven't seen any user
> complaints about them.)

It would be nice to set up ra_svn at svn.collab.net, to serve the
Subversion repository. The only thing lacking is some sort of simple
auth system (like the http basic auth we use with ra_dav)... Or am I
behind the times, and ra_svn is capable of this now?

I can't think of any reason why ra_svn and ra_dav wouldn't play nice
with each other.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 18 05:26:45 2003