[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: eol style differences

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2003-03-11 22:37:15 CET

On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 16:32, Sander Striker wrote:
> > We can, but I think the point is to avoid the complexity of translating
> > keywords one way and newlines the other. We can translate them both
> > from base-style to wc-style as long as we make sure to use the same
> > keyword translations as we used for the current wc copy.
>
> Wouldn't that screw up context in diffs? [it might contain the expanded
> keywords]

That depends on whether you think it's "screwed up" to have an expanded
keyword in the context.

Certainly, if you produce a context diff and then try to apply it to a
different working copy, you'll get a conflict. But a collapsed keyword
would also generate a conflict.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 11 22:38:05 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.