RE: eol style differences

> From: Greg Hudson [mailto:ghudson@MIT.EDU]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 9:30 PM

> On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 15:26, Sander Striker wrote:
> > > This just means we have to parameterize the keyword expansion code so
> > > that we can say "expand this text base with the same substitutions as
> > > we used on the working copy."
> >
> > We can simply translate the working copy to collapsed keywords. That
> > is already part of the API.
>
> We can, but I think the point is to avoid the complexity of translating
> keywords one way and newlines the other. We can translate them both
> from base-style to wc-style as long as we make sure to use the same
> keyword translations as we used for the current wc copy.

Wouldn't that screw up context in diffs? [it might contain the expanded
keywords]

Sander

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 11 22:33:16 2003