Re: [PATCH] MIME types, peer review

Benjamin Pflugmann <benjamin-svn-dev@pflugmann.de> writes:

> On Mon 2003-03-10 at 12:11:32 -0800, Daniel Rall wrote:
> > Message-ID <3E6CE1AE.7000203@therealm.demon.co.uk> contains a patch as
> > an attachment.
>
> Hummm. He explicitly explained why he did not mark with [PATCH]. If
> you have reason to think marking it as patch nonetheless is the right
> thing to do, you failed to explain those reasons.

IMHO, it's more likely to get review if marked with PATCH...YMMV.

-- 
Daniel Rall <dlr@finemaltcoding.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org