Re: [1165] strictness of svn_config to Python's ConfigParser API
From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_finemaltcoding.com>
Date: 2003-03-07 17:47:54 CET
=?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> Daniel Rall wrote:
Python 1.5.2 and 2.2 is showing me slightly different behavior:
[DEFAULT]
[section1]
>>> cfg = ConfigParser.ConfigParser()
This behavior strikes me as quite useful in many scenarios. However,
> The /defaults/ parameter to the ConfigParser constructor is something
Sounds good to me.
> >2) Variable substitution isn't handled (duh)
Of course.
> >3) __name__ option isn't handled (should default to the name of the
Okay.
> >#2 sees like the main target, but I was curious if I should bother
The description of [DEFAULT] doesn't match what I'm seeing. The
-- Daniel Rall <dlr@finemaltcoding.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Fri Mar 7 17:48:31 2003 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.