Re: mod_dav_svn backward compatibility broken?

mark benedetto king wrote:

>4.) Use existing properties infrastructure.
>
> The only thing I don't like about this is that the other WC
> props are transmitted one way, why should this one be different?
>
It shouldn't -- the *others* should become like this one. :-)

>I'm not married to any one of these proposals; I think they all have
>merit. If I had to choose, I think (4) would get my vote.
>
Mine, too.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org