On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 06:07:41PM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote:
> brane@tigris.org writes:
> > Log:
> > We decided some time ago to kill off this txn_checkpoint.
> >
> > * subversion/libsvn_fs/fs.c (cleanup_fs): Don't call txn_checkpoint.
>
> I had a local diff with this change, and have been testing it using
> stress.pl. I didn't really see much improvement (though I'm not
> totally convinced that my testing methodology was perfect). I did get
> some deadlocks with the change, that I didn't seem to get without it.
>
> I'm not objecting to the change -- I mean, it makes sense -- so much
> as asking if you tested. Did it make a difference for you, and if so,
> what sort?
>
I know you were asking Brane, but:
When I was using a 4.0.x BDB instead of 4.1.x, I was unable to run
either make svncheck or make davcheck to completion without this change.
--ben
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 4 20:31:46 2003