[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: rev 5194 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2003-03-04 01:07:41 CET

brane@tigris.org writes:
> Log:
> We decided some time ago to kill off this txn_checkpoint.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_fs/fs.c (cleanup_fs): Don't call txn_checkpoint.

I had a local diff with this change, and have been testing it using
stress.pl. I didn't really see much improvement (though I'm not
totally convinced that my testing methodology was perfect). I did get
some deadlocks with the change, that I didn't seem to get without it.

I'm not objecting to the change -- I mean, it makes sense -- so much
as asking if you tested. Did it make a difference for you, and if so,
what sort?

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 4 01:43:20 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.