[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: When to use Berkeley transactions.

From: Glenn A. Thompson <gthompson_at_cdr.net>
Date: 2003-02-21 19:31:13 CET

>
>
>There's no reason for it to be any more BDB specific than the current
>transactions are. I was thinking of expanding the trail interface
>slightly. The BDB implementation would handle locking for read-only
>operations. What the *SQL implementation does is then irrelevant, as
>long as it avoids race conditions on table access.
>
This sounds good.

>
>
>
>>I have no doubt that you can make it cleaner and faster. But will it
>>be as flexible?
>>
>>
>
>Can it get any less flexible than it is now? :-)
>
Sure it could.

gat

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Feb 21 19:31:41 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.