Re: When to use Berkeley transactions.

Glenn A. Thompson wrote:

> But will it become more BDB specific?

There's no reason for it to be any more BDB specific than the current
transactions are. I was thinking of expanding the trail interface
slightly. The BDB implementation would handle locking for read-only
operations. What the *SQL implementation does is then irrelevant, as
long as it avoids race conditions on table access.

> I have no doubt that you can make it cleaner and faster. But will it
> be as flexible?

Can it get any less flexible than it is now? :-)

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org