[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: rev 4916

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2003-02-19 07:23:27 CET

Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
> A magical fix? That isn't very encouraging :-)

No -- but after searching through the logs for a while, we couldn't
see an obvious change which would have fixed it.

> I don't think Dan meant "X:" literatlly, but that a prefix was used which
> wasn't defined. The question is "which one?" It sounds like whatever mbk is
> using is generating a bad request. What rev? And why is it bad? Why would
> svn.collab.net reject it, but a new server accept it?

In an ideal world, I'd like to know the answer to those questions :-).
But are they really worth chasing down when we have so much else to
work on? My feeling is, if the problem comes back, then we hunt.
Otherwise, move on.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Feb 19 07:56:29 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.