[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: libsvn_auth going to solve the user/passwd file problem?

From: Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz_at_apache.org>
Date: 2003-02-11 18:26:06 CET

--On Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:51 AM -0600 Karl Fogel
<kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> wrote:

> As long as the user approved it, I think it's fine. There should
> be a way to get implicit approval via the configuration files, of
> course, for those who don't want to be prompted every time.

Okay, so I think 'store-password = yes' would do that. Fair enough.
(I wonder if we should make it tri-value: no/prompt/always instead?)

> Also, there needs to be some way to prevent the prompt, without
> implying approval. For example, some wrappers need to know that svn
> will not go interactive on them. They might pass "--username" and
> "--password" explicitly. Should SVN prompt about storing then, or
> not?

I'm not sure whether the libsvn_auth layer will have the knowledge
that the password was passed at the command line. But, if it does
know, I agree - explicit passing of user/pass on the command line
should not prompt either. I'm afraid it won't know though. -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Feb 11 18:26:51 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.