[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: "svn status" handling uncontrolled and non-existant files

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: 2003-02-03 02:52:06 CET

Karl Fogel wrote:
> Hey, Julian, did you mean to send this to the whole list? It only
> went to me...

Yes. I have just noticed and re-sent.

I'm not used to mailing lists that don't munge Reply-to to point to the
list. My mail client, Mozilla, doesn't have a "Reply to mailing list"
function, so I have to remember to use "Reply all" (do you want to
receive a personal copy as well as the one to the list?) or change the
"To" address manually. Is there a policy on Reply-to? I tried setting
"Reply-to" to point back to the list in a message that I sent, because I
don't want to receive two copies of each reply, but the list server
removed it. Some people (including you, Karl) specify a Reply-to which
is a personal address different from the address you send from, and the
list server removes that too. That seems a bit sub-optimal.

- Julian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Feb 3 02:49:47 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.