checksums, another data point
From: Benjamin Pflugmann <benjamin-svn-dev_at_pflugmann.de>
Date: 2003-02-02 00:17:28 CET
Hi.
After 2 weeks of not having not much time, I tried to update my
The interesting part is that I got exactly the same as Garrett
http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=30230
I read the whole checksums threads in the archive again to be sure
Anyhow, as I said, I have exactly the same problem (win-tests.py),
I last updated my tree on the 18th to r4420. Unfortunately, I cannot
As the mentioned thread says, both my files, the base and the working
As shown in the post from David, both checksums can actually be found
$ svn cat http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/win-tests.py -r 4371 | openssl md5
The changlog shows (which apparently nobody mentioned until now):
$svn log -r 4371 .
* Just about everything else that wasn't test output, a binary file,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
So it seems, that when I updated to r4420 (with the binary compiled
Oh! My! God!
After trying for more than half an hour to reproduce the behaviour
http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgId=219941
It seems that changing text-bases isn't a good idea when md5sums are
Although I have to admit, I still get a headache when I try to follow
And the solution is: don't mess around with the text-base, even when
And does
http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=30132
have influence on this (I think not, because the the sums should be
HTH,
Benjamin.
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.