Re: svn commit: rev 4685 - in trunk/subversion: include libsvn_wc libsvn_client libsvn_auth

mark benedetto king <mbk@boredom.org> writes:

> svn_error_t * (*first_credentials) (void **credentials,
> void **iter_baton,
> void *provider_baton,
> svn_boolean_t *private,
> apr_pool_t *pool);
>
> where "private" would be set to indicate that the credentials
> supplied MUST NOT be disclosed to other providers.

This proposal doesn't solve the problem for me. What bugs me is the
non-determinism of looping over provider's save-functions. Sure, your
idea allows a specific provider to keep itself out of the loop, but it
doesn't solve the fundamental problem for me.

As I said earlier, I think the solution here is either

 1. each provider is completely self-contained, capable of saving.

 or

 2. each provider has the ability to delegate *another* provider for
    saving.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jan 31 16:45:02 2003