> From: cmpilato@tigris.org [mailto:cmpilato@tigris.org]
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:13 AM
> Author: cmpilato
> Date: 2003-01-31 02:12:13 -0600 (Fri, 31 Jan 2003)
> New Revision: 4685
>
> Modified:
> trunk/subversion/include/svn_error_codes.h
> trunk/subversion/libsvn_auth/auth.c
> trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/auth.c
> trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/simple_wc_provider.c
> Log:
> More issue #724 - Some fixes, and now only try to save using the
> provider that supplied the creds.
Huh? I really don't get this. A simple prompting provider won't
be able to save creds, so if a passwd is not in a cache it has no
chance of ever getting in? My take on this was try the provider
you got the creds from first, if that fails cycle over all others.
> Also note: I noticed tonight that Ben seems to have forgotten all
> about the --no-auth-cache and run-time config "store-password"
> options. We have regressed a bit in that those things are ignored so
> far in the new auth system.
This can be done in the phase where we register the providers. If
--no-auth-cache is present, simply not register the provider that
gets/sets the user/pass in the working copy. And do register it
if store-password is present.
Sander
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jan 31 09:44:44 2003