[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Issue 730 related question about svn_ra_reporter_t interface

From: <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2003-01-30 18:08:05 CET

John Barstow John_Barstow@gfsg.co.nz writes:
 Checkouts and updates would ideally be atomic. So, I assume what's happening
 is:

We decided there was no need for them to be atomic, as long as they
were continuable. I think this works out best for users in practice,
because people doing large checkouts or updates over an unreliable
link would like resumable behavior.

By the way, I very much like Greg Hudson's thinking that updates and
checkouts should operate the same way, and that if part of making
checkouts continuable is to first fix updates and checkouts to be
essentially the same operation, that's great (haven't asked Nuutti how
*he* feels about that, though :-) ).

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 14 02:25:38 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.