[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: ra_dav defunct? [Re: svn stability problems]

From: <rbb_at_rkbloom.net>
Date: 2003-01-16 00:44:17 CET

On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, [UTF-8] Branko Čibej wrote:

> Brandon Ehle wrote:
> >ra_svn is working great for us even on large repositories. There's
> >couple of bugs here & there but on the whole its far more stable than
> >ra_dav and faster too.
> This is very bad news. To hear that ra_dav, which is more than two years
> old, behaves worse than ra_svn, a relative newcomer --- well, it makes
> one wonder if we didn't make the wrong decision about our initial remote
> protocol after all. ra_dav has taken up a lot of our time, an it looks
> like we still haven't even started working on the most basic stability
> problem.
> *sigh*

I hate to say this, but I have to. The real question, is where is the
stability problem, in ra_dav or in Apache itself? I have an Apache
installation that arbitrarily dies about once every three or four weeks.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 16 00:31:19 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.