ra_dav defunct? [Re: svn stability problems]

Brandon Ehle wrote:
>ra_svn is working great for us even on large repositories. There's
>couple of bugs here & there but on the whole its far more stable than
>ra_dav and faster too.

This is very bad news. To hear that ra_dav, which is more than two years
old, behaves worse than ra_svn, a relative newcomer --- well, it makes
one wonder if we didn't make the wrong decision about our initial remote
protocol after all. ra_dav has taken up a lot of our time, an it looks
like we still haven't even started working on the most basic stability
problem.

*sigh*

--
Brane "Let's Move Everything to CORBA-Over-SOAP" Čibej
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org