[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Registry template for Win32 changed?

From: Branko ─îibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2003-01-15 19:45:02 CET

cmpilato@collab.net wrote:

>cmpilato@collab.net writes:
>
>
>
>>cmpilato@collab.net writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>I don't know about the win32 registry, but the proxy variable names
>>>>have definitely all changed in the ~/.subversion/servers file. I
>>>>wonder if the registry keys need to be caught up too...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>The win32 key names are defined to be exactly like the keys in the INI
>>>files. I'll fix the posted .reg file.
>>>
>>>
>>New .reg is posted, but it seems someone has fouled up the code that
>>allows empty registry entries to be treated as non-existant (a useful
>>feature since the registry doesn't have the luxury of commented-out
>>reminders of key names). So, for now, you should delete any of the
>>keys that you aren't using.
>>
>>
>
>Ah. I see that this code was instead changed to ignore keys that
>start with '#'. A little...non-Windows-y, but whatever. I'll fix the
>.reg template to account for this.
>
>

It's also a little non-Windows-y to ignore empty registry values. :-)
The point of the exercise was to let you create example registry
templates where the values are present but ignored, _and_ support empty
values, all at the same time.

-- 
Brane ─îibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jan 15 19:45:53 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.