Re: READ ME: working copy ickiness!

On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 11:03:09AM +1100, William Uther wrote:
>
[snip]
> I also think this is a good feature. What I'd like is a feature to do
> the following:
>
> i) check checksums vs text-base. If they differ then mark the file
> broken, and optionally contact the repository to fix it.
>
> ii) Contact the repos to verify the checksum of every file. Contact
> the repository to fix broken files.
[snip]

One other nice-to-have would be something that fixes up the timestamps
in the entries files so that svn st doesn't have to do a brute force
scan of the contents of the files if something forgets to update the
timestamps (like the recent eol-style propchanges.)

-- 
Michael Wood <mwood@its.uct.ac.za>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org