RE: READ ME: working copy ickiness!

> 'svn revert' just copies the text-base on top of the working file.
> But the whole point here is that the text-bases are *wrong*. They're
> wrong in the sense that the text-bases no longer are identical to
> what's in the repository, which is our cardinal rule.

Hmmm... perhaps there should be a command or option that forces an update of
the text-base from the repository. After all, your example alters the
text-base by hand intentionally, but someone could do that accidentally; for
example, using a wildcard that affects more files than intended.

'svn restore' or somesuch. Thoughts?

John C Barstow

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jan 14 23:09:14 2003