[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: question about issue 617, building without ra_dav

From: Michael Wood <mwood_at_its.uct.ac.za>
Date: 2003-01-03 10:31:37 CET

On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 07:50:35PM -0600, kbrannen@gte.net wrote:
[snip]
> Is there any reason not to create disable-ra_local and disable-ra_dav
> configure options (with the defaults being to have them enabled if the
> proper dependencies can be found)? Or should these be entirely
> dependency based? I would personally prefer the first, but guidance
> would be very helpful. I guess I could do ra_svn too if needed.
[snip]

If my vote counts for anything, I vote for the former. What if I have
neon installed, but want to build without ra_dav support? Or if I have
BDB installed, but only want ra_dav compiled in?

-- 
Michael Wood <mwood@its.uct.ac.za>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jan 3 10:33:08 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.