[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn 1.0 in 2006 or now?

From: Perry E. Metzger <perry_at_piermont.com>
Date: 2003-01-02 18:08:44 CET

solo turn <soloturn99@yahoo.com> writes:
> exactly what perry is saying is the point. current plans point to
> 0.17, 0.18, ..., 0.23. given you need 2 months for each 0.XX, this
> means 14 months to reach beta. this means productive mid 2004. and
> this is NOT august 2002, as originally planned.

Indeed. What the numbering scheme is I don't much care about, but it
would be nice to have an *official* release that is said to be stable
for real users soon. It can have provisos like "we'll be making major
changes in interfaces", and it an be numbered anything you like, but
it has to be labeled "stable (in the sense of bugs) release".

By the way, at the same time, it would be good to have a users mailing
list, separate from the developers mailing list, for people who are
purely users to ask questions about using the product...


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 2 18:09:37 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.