Re: Is this 'status -u' behaviour correct?
From: Andreas J. Koenig <andreas.koenig_at_anima.de>
Date: 2002-12-29 10:38:30 CET
>>>>> On 28 Dec 2002 13:50:09 -0600, Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> said:
> Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> Whups -- thanks, Brane, I missed the first command and saw only the
I forgive you;)
> Yup, this is a bug. However, I'm not able to reproduce it with a
> $ svn st -u
> (If I run 'svn st -uv', it agrees that ch06.xml is the only file
It's not broken all the time. So far I have only seen it with this
> Andreas, can you reproduce this with your same working copy and
Yes.
Here is a small testcase. Starting with an empty repository I run the
mkdir ws1 ws2
The last two commands as seen on my terminal:
10:29:17 k@k242:~/tmp/svn-crontab-bug/ws2% svn st -u
-- andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Sun Dec 29 10:39:24 2002 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.