[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Is this 'status -u' behaviour correct?

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2002-12-28 20:50:09 CET

Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> Er, Karl, look at his post again. That's the output of the second
> command, not the first one.

Whups -- thanks, Brane, I missed the first command and saw only the
second (with "-v"). Sorry, Andreas :-).

Yup, this is a bug. However, I'm not able to reproduce it with a
relatively recent client, operating against the (recently upgraded)
server at svn.collab.net:

   $ svn st -u
          * 4195 doc/book/book/ch06.xml
   Head revision: 4196

(If I run 'svn st -uv', it agrees that ch06.xml is the only file
needing an update.)

Andreas, can you reproduce this with your same working copy and
repository, but using HEAD for both server and client?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Dec 28 21:32:52 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.