[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: text-base penalty: A proposed solution

From: Kean Johnston <jkj_at_sco.com>
Date: 2002-12-17 07:17:10 CET

> The prime benefit which motivated the text-base was limiting
> the network bandwidth used by commits, as I understand it.
Would a copy-on-edit model not address that and the speedy
diff requirement?

> Well, not exactly. It turns out that for every file in the working
> directory, there are four in the admin area--text base, props, prop
> base, wcprops. We should probably trim this to two (text base and
> props+propbase+wcprops), but that still leaves only a 50%
I don't know the code and I am sure you do, but how genericaly useful
is the filesystem-inside-DB code? Is it worth thinking about having
the admin area be such a database rather than actual physical files?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 17 07:17:48 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.